IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Emmet Powell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-06-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Milton Academy NE-Prep 21 4 7 11 0.524 0.1056 0.1056 0.2397 0.2397
2020-21 South Shore Kings NCDC 26 3 7 10 0.385 0.1084 0.1084 0.3114 0.3114
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC SR 19 3 12 15 0.789
2021-22 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC JR 25 7 9 16 0.640
2020-21 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC SO 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC FR 26 5 4 9 0.346
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2019-20 · Wesleyan
+247.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
92%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11327
Defenseman overall
#1542
Defenseman born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Kyle Mackey
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Derek Smith
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Grabowski
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Princeton (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Yoder
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chris Carr
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Mood
Chatham · 2017-18
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wyatt Trumbley
Westfield State · 2012-13
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.