IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Regnars Udris Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-01-06 Country: Latvia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 St. Louis Jr. Blues NA3HL 41 2 17 19 0.463 0.0590 0.0626 0.1466 0.1555
2017-18 — NA3HL 45 16 28 44 0.978 0.1246 0.1258 0.3093 0.3124
2018-19 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 25 3 9 12 0.480 0.0630 0.0607 0.1630 0.1569
2019-20 Florida Eels USPHL-Premier 42 6 23 29 0.691 0.0906 0.0906 0.2344 0.2344
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC — 5 1 0 1 0.200
2020-21 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
15%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10582
Defenseman overall
#2005
Defenseman born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gabriel Chenard-Poirier
Babson · 2005-06
0.448 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin Gibson
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2009-10
0.448 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Vanuden
Finlandia · 2017-18
0.280 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.