IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Kennedy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-01-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Provo Predators USPHL-Premier 43 0 16 16 0.372 0.0420 0.0420 0.1266 0.1266
2021-22 Richmond Generals USPHL-Premier 27 4 15 19 0.704 0.0794 0.0767 0.2394 0.2313
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Neumann D3 MAC SR 27 0 8 8 0.296
2024-25 Neumann D3 MAC JR 23 3 6 9 0.391
2023-24 Neumann D3 MAC SO 24 0 4 4 0.167
2022-23 Neumann D3 MAC FR 22 0 2 2 0.091
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.09
2022-23 · Neumann
+25.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
22%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7476
Defenseman overall
#1770
Defenseman born in 2002
#2420
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Turner Richards
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2023-24
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Stirling
Connecticut College · 2016-17
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Joel Whited
Wisconsin-Stout · 2006-07
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.