IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Josef Slepica Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-10-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Northern Lakes USHS-MN 25 5 3 8 0.320 0.0394 0.0394 0.0777 0.0777
2021-22 Minnesota Wilderness NA3HL 23 1 3 4 0.174 0.0192 0.0192 0.0551 0.0550
2022-23 New Jersey Rockets USPHL-Premier 41 1 7 8 0.195 0.0220 0.0210 0.0664 0.0634
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Salem State D3 MASCAC GR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Salem State D3 MASCAC SR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Salem State D3 MASCAC JR 10 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22723
Defenseman overall
#3543
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hunter Alden
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2018-19
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Hammerbeck
St. Norbert · 2006-07
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Geoffrey Gieni
St. Olaf · 2010-11
0.111 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.