IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jay Feldberg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-02-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 32 1 7 8 0.250 0.0751 0.0831 0.1711 0.1894
2023-24 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 51 12 24 36 0.706 0.2121 0.2238 0.4832 0.5097
2024-25 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 49 19 21 40 0.816 0.2452 0.2461 0.5588 0.5608
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Boston University D1 HockeyEast FR 7 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28780
Forward overall
#1459
Forward born in 2006
#1825
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Mason Jobst
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Mackenzie MacEachern
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Michigan (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Aman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jeff Kubiak
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy DeVito
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ RPI (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Eric Rubino
Williams · 2007-08
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jared Docking
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2006-07
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Trevor Wilhelm
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2016-17
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.