IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kayson Un Yi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-09-19 Country: Canada
Elmira
UCHC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Trenton Golden Hawks OJHL 43 9 12 21 0.488 0.1197 0.1237 0.3362 0.3475
2024-25 Trenton Golden Hawks OJHL 6 3 0 3 0.500 0.1226 0.1204 0.3442 0.3381
2025-26 Boston Dogs NCDC 39 23 7 30 0.769 0.3136 0.3016 0.6155 0.5919
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
55%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13479
Forward overall
#658
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Elmira Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Christian Lloyd
0.79
actual FR PPG at Elmira
Jake Russo
0.36
actual FR PPG at Elmira
Jason Fransky
0.00
actual FR PPG at Elmira
Greg Whittle
0.73
actual FR PPG at Elmira

D2/3 Comparables

Justin Ryan
SUNY Oswego · 2023-24
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicolas Guerra
Concordia · 2016-17
0.783 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Samodral
Chatham · 2023-24
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.