← New Search ↗ Social Card

Milo Tian Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-01-17 Country: China
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Quinnipiac
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Avon Old Farms NE-Prep 22 0 4 4 0.182 0.0360 0.0360 0.0828 0.0828
2024-25 King Rebellion OJHL 49 7 5 12 0.245 0.0600 0.0599 0.1686 0.1684
2025-26 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 44 5 13 18 0.409 0.1003 0.0947 0.2817 0.2661
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#48812
Forward overall
#3136
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

Quinnipiac Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2019-20
0.20
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.14
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
USHL 2017-18
0.25
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac

D2/3 Comparables

Marian · 2005-06
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2016-17
0.133 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2013-14
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.