IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Javian Nei Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-01-24 Country: Canada
Union
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Toronto Patriots OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2025-26 — OJHL 49 15 12 27 0.551 0.1351 0.1412 0.3793 0.3965
2026-27 Aurora Tigers OJHL 10 6 6 12 1.200 0.2941 0.2951 0.8260 0.8289
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18365
Forward overall
#297
Forward born in 2008
#677
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Andrew Poturalski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Zach Aman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Schempp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Blake Winiecki
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joe Cox
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Union Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Jack Adams
USHL 2015-16
0.46
actual FR PPG at Union
Elliot Gulley
USHL 2024-25
0.00
actual FR PPG at Union
Ben Muthersbaugh
NAHL 2022-23
0.78
actual FR PPG at Union
Caden Villegas
NAHL 2019-20
0.25
actual FR PPG at Union

D2/3 Comparables

Casey Shade
Wentworth · 2005-06
1.407 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Sanders
Elmira · 2007-08
0.815 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Chad Anderson
Norwich · 2004-05
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.