IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Javian Nei Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-01-24 Country: Canada
Union
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Toronto Patriots OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2025-26 — OJHL 49 15 12 27 0.551 0.1351 0.1412 0.3794 0.3966
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#34201
Forward overall
#566
Forward born in 2008
#1951
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Kyle Eastman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siroky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Miami (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joe Widmar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ UMass (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jake Evans
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Félix Caron
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ RPI (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Union Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Andrew Seaman
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.22
actual FR PPG at Union
Blake Hayward
BCHL 2015-16
0.33
actual FR PPG at Union
Caden Villegas
NAHL 2018-19
0.25
actual FR PPG at Union
Ben Muthersbaugh
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.78
actual FR PPG at Union

D2/3 Comparables

Nicholas Kent
Hamilton · 2018-19
0.793 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Zane Kindrachuk
Albertus Magnus · 2017-18
0.737 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Paul Soubry
Augsburg · 2012-13
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.