← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adrien Bisson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-01-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 10 0 1 1 0.100 0.0217 0.0240 0.0774 0.0856
2016-17 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 40 2 11 13 0.325 0.0705 0.0743 0.2515 0.2649
2017-18 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 47 3 21 24 0.511 0.1107 0.1109 0.3951 0.3958
2018-19 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 51 7 21 28 0.549 0.1191 0.1140 0.4248 0.4067
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Mercyhurst D1 AHA 23 2 6 8 0.348
2022-23 Mercyhurst D1 AHA 36 0 5 5 0.139
2021-22 Maine D1 HockeyEast JR 30 4 3 7 0.233
2020-21 Maine D1 HockeyEast SO 16 2 4 6 0.375
2019-20 Maine D1 HockeyEast FR 33 2 5 7 0.212
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2019-20 · Maine
+99.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10300
Defenseman overall
#1957
Defenseman born in 1999
#879
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Castleton · 2015-16
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2008-09
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lawrence · 2010-11
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.