← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrea Blais Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-05-19 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Misericordia
MAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Smiths Falls Bears CCHL 18 2 4 6 0.333 0.0723 0.0744 0.2553 0.2626
2025-26 Smiths Falls Bears CCHL 55 9 14 23 0.418 0.0907 0.0883 0.3203 0.3117
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#40947
Forward overall
#2438
Forward born in 2006
#1086
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

Misericordia Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.00
actual FR PPG at Misericordia
0.29
actual FR PPG at Misericordia
0.38
actual FR PPG at Misericordia
0.00
actual FR PPG at Misericordia

D2/3 Comparables

Skidmore · 2017-18
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Franklin Pierce · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2023-24
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.