IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Pierson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-10-05 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Skidmore
SUNYAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 New Hampton NE-Prep 35 7 7 14 0.400 0.0792 0.0792 0.1822 0.1822
2023-24 New Hampton NE-Prep 33 11 18 29 0.879 0.1741 0.1741 0.4004 0.4004
2024-25 New Hampton NE-Prep 33 15 19 34 1.030 0.2041 0.2041 0.4694 0.4694
2025-26 Rockland Nationals CCHL 43 8 18 26 0.605 0.1312 0.1302 0.4679 0.4642
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22814
Forward overall
#1042
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

Skidmore Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Jack Bartfield
0.50
actual FR PPG at Skidmore
Tyler Chenevert
0.00
actual FR PPG at Skidmore
Nicholas Stuckless
0.48
actual FR PPG at Skidmore
Nick Troutwine
0.43
actual FR PPG at Skidmore

D2/3 Comparables

Kevin Leonard
Western New England · 2001-02
0.588 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryce Ferrell
SUNY Potsdam · 2015-16
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Trevor Geiger
St. Scholastica · 2003-04
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.