IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matthew Itzkovitz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-09-27 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Connecticut College
NESCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Pomfret NE-Prep 26 4 1 5 0.192 0.0387 0.0387 0.0879 0.0879
2024-25 Pomfret NE-Prep 29 8 18 26 0.897 0.1803 0.1803 0.4100 0.4100
2025-26 — CCHL 33 11 14 25 0.758 0.1643 0.1628 0.5803 0.5751
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28139
Forward overall
#1422
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Connecticut College Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Jordan Gray
0.61
actual FR PPG at Connecticut College
Greg Pezza
0.30
actual FR PPG at Connecticut College
Arthur Mirante
0.52
actual FR PPG at Connecticut College
Anthony Quatieri
0.59
actual FR PPG at Connecticut College

D2/3 Comparables

Joe Mancuso
Neumann · 2018-19
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Lowe
Adrian · 2010-11
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Artur Terchiyev
Wisconsin-Superior · 2016-17
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.