IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Logan Wilson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-07-14 Country: Canada
St. Lawrence
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 42 8 14 22 0.524 0.1136 0.1285 0.4053 0.4583
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
60%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#33857
Forward overall
#148
Forward born in 2009
#790
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Shane Gersich
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Stevens
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joe Wegwerth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
J.J. Piccinich
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Boston University (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Chris Dodero
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ American International (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

St. Lawrence Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Cayden Casey
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.31
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
Reilly Connors
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.26
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
Sam LeDrew
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.56
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
Sam Kauppila
NTDP-U18 2012-13
0.09
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence

D2/3 Comparables

Keenan Hodgson
Amherst · 2009-10
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Bellant
Adrian · 2013-14
1.462 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Hogan
Utica · 2006-07
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.