IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sam Luan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-01-12 Country: China
Lebanon Valley
MAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Boston Jr. Rangers NCDC 50 14 22 36 0.720 0.2935 0.2722 0.5787 0.5368
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
48%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7625
Forward overall
#277
Forward born in 2005
#172
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Lebanon Valley Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Cameron Croteau
0.40
actual FR PPG at Lebanon Valley
Carmen Dalesandro
0.00
actual FR PPG at Lebanon Valley
Mark Kishko
0.25
actual FR PPG at Lebanon Valley
Artem Kondrashov
0.50
actual FR PPG at Lebanon Valley

D2/3 Comparables

Cory Anderson
Manhattanville · 2014-15
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nikolai Tishkevich
Neumann · 2024-25
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Doyle
Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.