IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob Owens Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-09-02 Country: USA
Tufts
NESCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Hotchkiss School NE-Prep 21 6 7 13 0.619 0.1226 0.1226 0.2820 0.2820
2023-24 Hotchkiss School NE-Prep 25 15 21 36 1.440 0.2853 0.2853 0.6561 0.6561
2024-25 South Shore Kings NCDC 55 12 19 31 0.564 0.2298 0.2328 0.4530 0.4590
2025-26 South Shore Kings NCDC 49 14 17 31 0.633 0.2580 0.2475 0.5086 0.4880
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
30%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10342
Forward overall
#451
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Tufts Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Rory Andriole
0.37
actual FR PPG at Tufts
Peter Hatton
0.31
actual FR PPG at Tufts
Mason Babbidge
0.36
actual FR PPG at Tufts
Kyle Gallegos
1.15
actual FR PPG at Tufts

D2/3 Comparables

Adam Beauvais
SUNY Brockport · 2021-22
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jonathan Waring
Endicott · 2016-17
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Wendorf
Hamline · 2016-17
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.