IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendan Peck Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-06-14 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Tufts
NESCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Brooks School NE-Prep 25 8 7 15 0.600 0.1189 0.1189 0.2734 0.2734
2024-25 Brooks School NE-Prep 26 14 12 26 1.000 0.1981 0.1981 0.4556 0.4556
2025-26 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 49 13 11 24 0.490 0.1997 0.1994 0.3937 0.3931
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
48%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19559
Forward overall
#836
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alfred Larsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Tufts Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Kyle Gallegos
1.15
actual FR PPG at Tufts
Mason Babbidge
0.36
actual FR PPG at Tufts
Peter Hatton
0.31
actual FR PPG at Tufts
J.J. Ganss
0.00
actual FR PPG at Tufts

D2/3 Comparables

Nolan Redler
UMass Boston · 2015-16
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Isak Tranvik
St. Olaf · 2005-06
0.920 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Bessing
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2007-08
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.