IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

John Rusen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-11-06 Country: USA
SUNY Brockport
UCHC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Worcester Jr. Railers NCDC 46 1 4 5 0.109 0.0443 0.0453 0.0874 0.0893
2025-26 Worcester Jr. Railers NCDC 50 1 11 12 0.240 0.0978 0.0947 0.1929 0.1868
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
30%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15100
Defenseman overall
#2872
Defenseman born in 2005
#1484
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

SUNY Brockport Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Michael Gershon
0.40
actual FR PPG at SUNY Brockport
Jacob Gates
0.24
actual FR PPG at SUNY Brockport
Ryan Romeo
0.35
actual FR PPG at SUNY Brockport
Zach Norby
0.20
actual FR PPG at SUNY Brockport

D2/3 Comparables

Christopher Maybury
Westfield State · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Daniel Hamburg
Castleton · 2012-13
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Hadland
University of New England · 2022-23
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.