← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ty Henry Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-07-19 Country: Canada
2024 · Round 6, Pick #163  ·  Chicago Blackhawks Chicago Blackhawks
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
St. Thomas
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 — OJHL 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 — CCHL 41 2 9 11 0.268 0.0582 0.0661 — —
2023-24 Erie Otters OHL 54 0 7 7 0.130 0.0750 0.0796 0.3393 0.3599
2024-25 Erie Otters OHL 63 1 16 17 0.270 0.1561 0.1575 0.7064 0.7129
2026-27 Erie Otters OHL 5 1 1 2 0.400 0.2314 0.2314 1.0474 1.0474
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15169
Defenseman overall
#2707
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

St. Thomas Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2021-22
0.37
actual FR PPG at St. Thomas
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.14
actual FR PPG at St. Thomas
USHS-MN 2022-23
0.11
actual FR PPG at St. Thomas
BCHL 2022-23
0.29
actual FR PPG at St. Thomas

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2017-18
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2002-03
0.966 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamline · 2014-15
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.