← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ty Henry Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-07-19 Country: Canada
2024 · Round 6, Pick #163  ·  Chicago Blackhawks Chicago Blackhawks
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
St. Thomas
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 OJHL 5 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 CCHL 41 2 9 11 0.268 0.0582 0.0661
2023-24 Erie Otters OHL 54 0 7 7 0.130 0.0750 0.0796 0.3330 0.3533
2024-25 Erie Otters OHL 63 1 16 17 0.270 0.1561 0.1575 0.6933 0.6997
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14971
Defenseman overall
#2681
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston University (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

St. Thomas Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2022-23
0.37
actual FR PPG at St. Thomas
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.14
actual FR PPG at St. Thomas
USHS-MN 2022-23
0.11
actual FR PPG at St. Thomas
USHL 2023-24
0.38
actual FR PPG at St. Thomas

D2/3 Comparables

Wentworth · 2006-07
1.389 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Amherst · 2011-12
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2009-10
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.