IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rasmus Ruusunen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-01-14 Country: Finland
Aurora
NCHA D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Tappara U20 SM-Liiga-Jr 28 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2024-25 Tappara U20 SM-Liiga-Jr 43 0 7 7 0.163 0.0882 0.0852 0.2462 0.2378
2025-26 Grand Junction River Hawks NCDC 38 2 9 11 0.289 0.1180 0.1095 0.2327 0.2159
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
32%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15785
Defenseman overall
#2979
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Aurora Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Simon Diaz
0.63
actual FR PPG at Aurora
Drew Doyon
0.63
actual FR PPG at Aurora
Connor Chilton
0.37
actual FR PPG at Aurora
Jack Jaunich
0.44
actual FR PPG at Aurora

D2/3 Comparables

Brandon Altman
Western New England · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Cam Gwatkin
Southern Maine · 2024-25
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Johns
Chatham · 2018-19
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.