← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chase Hull Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-04-28 Country: Canada
Penn State
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Renfrew Wolves CCHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2023-24 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 52 5 8 13 0.250 0.0963 0.1084 0.3636 0.4094
2024-25 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 53 13 13 26 0.491 0.1890 0.2033 0.7135 0.7675
2025-26 Flint Firebirds OHL 59 11 9 20 0.339 0.1961 0.1957 0.8876 0.8856
2026-27 Niagara IceDogs OHL 7 1 1 2 0.286 0.1653 0.1653 0.7481 0.7481
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#34045
Forward overall
#1305
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Penn State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2018-19
0.29
actual FR PPG at Penn State
USHL 2012-13
0.33
actual FR PPG at Penn State
CCHL 2015-16
0.48
actual FR PPG at Penn State
USHL 2018-19
0.19
actual FR PPG at Penn State

D2/3 Comparables

Wentworth · 2014-15
0.706 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2011-12
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2018-19
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.