IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chase Hull Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-04-28 Country: Canada
Penn State
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Renfrew Wolves CCHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2023-24 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 52 5 8 13 0.250 0.0963 0.1084 0.3638 0.4096
2024-25 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 53 13 13 26 0.491 0.1890 0.2033 0.7140 0.7681
2025-26 Flint Firebirds OHL 59 11 9 20 0.339 0.1961 0.1957 0.8711 0.8691
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#33609
Forward overall
#1255
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Josh Nenadal
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Pham
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Army (0.91 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Brad Hawkinson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy DeVito
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ RPI (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Christian Lampasso
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

Penn State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Dylan Lugris
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.29
actual FR PPG at Penn State
Xander Lamppa
USHL 2018-19
0.15
actual FR PPG at Penn State
Nikita Pavlychev
USHL 2015-16
0.36
actual FR PPG at Penn State
Carson Dyck
AJHL 2019-20
0.38
actual FR PPG at Penn State

D2/3 Comparables

David Italiano
Williams · 2011-12
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan DiScanio
University of New England · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike McPherson
Plymouth State · 2015-16
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.