← New Search ↗ Social Card

Samuel Evans Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-05-19 Country: USA
Franklin Pierce
NE10 D2

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 43 3 14 17 0.395 0.0913 0.0924 0.1934 0.1958
2025-26 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 43 2 19 21 0.488 0.1128 0.1078 0.2390 0.2284
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
35%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10115
Defenseman overall
#2186
Defenseman born in 2005
#1293
in EHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Franklin Pierce Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.00
actual FR PPG at Franklin Pierce
0.30
actual FR PPG at Franklin Pierce
0.24
actual FR PPG at Franklin Pierce
0.00
actual FR PPG at Franklin Pierce

D2/3 Comparables

Fredonia · 2016-17
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Arcadia · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2010-11
0.310 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.