IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cooper Joscelyn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-08-18 Country: USA
Franklin Pierce
NE10 D2

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Valley Jr. Warriors EHLP 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2024-25 Valley Jr. Warriors EHL 44 1 3 4 0.091 0.0210 0.0215 0.0445 0.0456
2025-26 East Coast Wizards EHL 43 1 8 9 0.209 0.0483 0.0468 0.1024 0.0991
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
70%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24957
Defenseman overall
#3975
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Franklin Pierce Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Nick Tessier
0.27
actual FR PPG at Franklin Pierce
Evan Marek
0.27
actual FR PPG at Franklin Pierce
Landon McClure
0.00
actual FR PPG at Franklin Pierce
Andrew Stahel
0.17
actual FR PPG at Franklin Pierce

D2/3 Comparables

Jake Stilwell
Concordia · 2014-15
0.263 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Cowan
St. Scholastica · 2009-10
0.261 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryce Sturm
New England College · 2023-24
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.