IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gerry DiCunzolo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-06-16 Country: USA
Penn State
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Peterborough Petes OHL 39 4 5 9 0.231 0.1335 0.1474 0.6043 0.6674
2026-27 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 8 2 0 2 0.250 0.1858 0.1858 0.9375 0.9375
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

57%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#40383
Forward overall
#230
Forward born in 2009

D1 Comparables

Dawson Cook
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan McLaughlin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Canisius (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Zach Evancho
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Army (0.62 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jake Ahlgren
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Bentley (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Moy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Harvard (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average
NCAAe PPG

Penn State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Carson Dyck
AJHL 2018-19
0.38
actual FR PPG at Penn State
Dylan Lugris
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.29
actual FR PPG at Penn State
Nic Chin-Degraves
AJHL 2020-21
0.27
actual FR PPG at Penn State
Alexander Servagno
USHL 2019-20
0.21
actual FR PPG at Penn State

D2/3 Comparables

Devin Niles
Fitchburg State · 2023-24
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Fiume
Neumann · 2000-01
1.040 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tom Bark
Lake Forest · 2006-07
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.