IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gerry DiCunzolo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-06-16 Country: USA
Penn State
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Peterborough Petes OHL 39 4 5 9 0.231 0.1335 0.1474 0.5930 0.6549
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
55%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#39918
Forward overall
#184
Forward born in 2009
#1301
in OHL

D1 Comparables

J.J. Piccinich
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Boston University (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joe Wegwerth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Chris Dodero
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ American International (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Grasso
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.82 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Shane Gersich
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Penn State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Dylan Lugris
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.29
actual FR PPG at Penn State
Sean Kohler
OJHL 2013-14
0.50
actual FR PPG at Penn State
Nic Chin-Degraves
AJHL 2019-20
0.27
actual FR PPG at Penn State
Tyler Gratton
NTDP-U18 2015-16
0.19
actual FR PPG at Penn State

D2/3 Comparables

Sam Huff
St. Thomas · 2014-15
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Richard Manley
SUNY Geneseo · 2006-07
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Marlon Gardner
Neumann · 2003-04
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.