IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Maksim Sokolovskii Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-07-12 Country: Russia
2026 · Round 1, Pick #27  ·  Philadelphia Flyers Philadelphia Flyers
Maine
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 London Knights OHL 44 2 6 8 0.182 0.1052 0.1113 0.4671 0.4942
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16271
Defenseman overall
#893
Defenseman born in 2008
#1443
in OHL

D1 Comparables

Nash Worden
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Army (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Teemu Kivihalme
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Luke Shiplo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Phil Beaulieu
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Keaton Thompson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

Maine Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Dawson Bruneski
AJHL 2016-17
0.00
actual FR PPG at Maine
Brandon Chabrier
USHL 2019-20
0.18
actual FR PPG at Maine
Levi Kleiboer
SJHL 2015-16
0.17
actual FR PPG at Maine
Simon Butala
NAHL 2015-16
0.06
actual FR PPG at Maine

D2/3 Comparables

Patrick Del Vecchio
Alvernia · 2017-18
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Artjoms Koppass
Curry · 2017-18
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Aaron Keaney
Neumann · 2005-06
0.765 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.