IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Liam O’Keeffe

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
Holy Cross
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Dexter NE-Prep 31 0 2 2 0.065 0.0128 0.0128 0.0294 0.0294
2023-24 Dexter NE-Prep 30 1 5 6 0.200 0.0396 0.0396 0.0911 0.0911
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
60%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27715
Defenseman overall
#1892
in NE-Prep

D1 Comparables

Kyle Mackey
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Yoder
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Lukas Buchta
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy Mazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

Holy Cross Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Anthony Biakabutuka
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.17
actual FR PPG at Holy Cross
Ryan Buckley
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.07
actual FR PPG at Holy Cross
Chris Sullivan
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.12
actual FR PPG at Holy Cross
Mack Oliphant
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.29
actual FR PPG at Holy Cross

D2/3 Comparables

Kurri Woodford
Fredonia · 2017-18
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Stenberg
Connecticut College · 2022-23
0.191 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke De Vries
Trine · 2021-22
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.