IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Declan Grenache Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
Babson
LittleEast D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Williston-Northampton NE-Prep 27 10 9 19 0.704 0.1394 0.1394 0.3206 0.3206
2024-25 Williston-Northampton NE-Prep 25 8 16 24 0.960 0.1902 0.1902 0.4374 0.4374
2025-26 Williston-Northampton NE-Prep 24 14 12 26 1.083 0.2146 0.2146 0.4936 0.4936
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18589
Forward overall
#153
in NE-Prep

D1 Comparables

Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jake Horton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mitch Hults
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Osterberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Babson Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Sam Sibold
0.36
actual FR PPG at Babson
Danny Cavanagh
0.42
actual FR PPG at Babson
Ian Driscoll
0.59
actual FR PPG at Babson
Nick Rosa
0.69
actual FR PPG at Babson

D2/3 Comparables

Parker Wood
Endicott · 2012-13
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Will LeNeave
Gustavus Adolphus · 2014-15
0.423 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Teddy Purcell
SUNY Geneseo · 2003-04
0.550 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.