IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Scott Allan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-03-04 Country: USA
Manhattanville
UCHC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Medicine Hat Tigers WHL 34 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2014-15 — WHL 59 1 3 4 0.068 0.0330 0.0327 0.1664 0.1650
2015-16 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 53 5 16 21 0.396 0.1527 0.1477 0.5766 0.5576
2016-17 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 45 2 9 11 0.244 0.0942 0.0863 0.3557 0.3258
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

NCAAe Rankings

#17818
Defenseman overall
#2206
Defenseman born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Manhattanville Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Mitchell Snider
0.00
actual FR PPG at Manhattanville
Adam Young
0.50
actual FR PPG at Manhattanville
Connor Boyce
0.33
actual FR PPG at Manhattanville
Frédéric D'Amours
0.00
actual FR PPG at Manhattanville

D2/3 Comparables

Sebastian Hamming
Hamilton · 2023-24
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Gori
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2003-04
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Taeron Lewis
Norwich · 2015-16
0.269 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.