← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brady Birnie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-09-07 Country: Canada
Bemidji State
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Swift Current Broncos WHL 4 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Swift Current Broncos WHL 66 6 9 15 0.227 0.1106 0.1230 0.5577 0.6201
2022-23 Swift Current Broncos WHL 68 18 21 39 0.574 0.2790 0.2972 1.4072 1.4989
2023-24 Swift Current Broncos WHL 68 22 28 50 0.735 0.3577 0.3634 1.8042 1.8329
2024-25 Swift Current Broncos WHL 61 26 39 65 1.066 0.5184 0.4990 2.6147 2.5166
2025-26 Penticton Vees WHL 67 22 48 70 1.045 0.5083 0.4657 2.5636 2.3487
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6370
Forward overall
#208
Forward born in 2005
#190
in WHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.48 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Bemidji State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

BCHL 2017-18
0.50
actual FR PPG at Bemidji State
BCHL 2013-14
0.30
actual FR PPG at Bemidji State
USHL 2015-16
0.00
actual FR PPG at Bemidji State
NAHL 2015-16
0.04
actual FR PPG at Bemidji State

D2/3 Comparables

Curry · 2006-07
1.769 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2015-16
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2016-17
1.423 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.