IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Henry Peterson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-02-25 Country: USA
St. Thomas
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Hermantown USHS-MN 16 0 2 2 0.125 0.0158 0.0158 0.0304 0.0304
2023-24 Hermantown USHS-MN 30 11 12 23 0.767 0.0971 0.0971 0.1862 0.1862
2024-25 Chippewa Steel NAHL 34 3 3 6 0.176 0.0648 0.0703 0.1863 0.2020
2025-26 Victoria Royals WHL 57 4 9 13 0.228 0.1110 0.1098 0.5597 0.5539
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12998
Defenseman overall
#1706
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Garret Cockerill
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Tim Davison
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Zach Frye
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Sam Piazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Michigan (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Niklas Folin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG

St. Thomas Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Colton Jamieson
USHS-MN 2022-23
0.11
actual FR PPG at St. Thomas
Carson Peters
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.14
actual FR PPG at St. Thomas
Chase Cheslock
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.37
actual FR PPG at St. Thomas
Mason Poolman
NAHL 2020-21
0.29
actual FR PPG at St. Thomas

D2/3 Comparables

Trevor Wilhelm
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2016-17
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cam Doull
Lake Forest · 2000-01
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Rubino
Williams · 2007-08
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.