← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gavin Clark Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-04-22 Country: USA
Merrimack
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Rochester Mayo USHS-MN 26 3 1 4 0.154 0.0195 0.0195 0.0373 0.0373
2025-26 Saskatoon Blades WHL 53 2 8 10 0.189 0.0918 0.0961 0.4609 0.4827
2026-27 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 4 1 0 1 0.250 0.1475 0.1475 0.7502 0.7502
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#50148
Forward overall
#1124
Forward born in 2008

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ RPI (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG

Merrimack Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2018-19
0.11
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
USHL 2017-18
0.39
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.33
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
BCHL 2017-18
0.42
actual FR PPG at Merrimack

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Boston · 2015-16
2.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2019-20
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2012-13
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.