← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aiden Kirkwood Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-03-18 Country: Canada
Cornell
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Baie-Comeau Drakkar QMJHL 2 1 0 1 0.500 0.2457 0.2697 1.3348 1.4654
2025-26 Baie-Comeau Drakkar QMJHL 60 2 8 10 0.167 0.0819 0.0860 0.4450 0.4675
2026-27 Baie-Comeau Drakkar QMJHL 5 2 0 2 0.400 0.1965 0.1965 1.0678 1.0678
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#51390
Forward overall
#1180
Forward born in 2008
#1653
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ RPI (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Cornell Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

BCHL 2019-20
0.45
actual FR PPG at Cornell
USHL 2023-24
0.59
actual FR PPG at Cornell
NE-Prep 2021-22
1.00
actual FR PPG at Cornell
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.10
actual FR PPG at Cornell

D2/3 Comparables

Bethel · 2019-20
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2017-18
1.409 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2012-13
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.