IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aiden Kirkwood Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-03-18 Country: Canada
Cornell
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Baie-Comeau Drakkar QMJHL 2 1 0 1 0.500 0.2457 0.2697 1.3352 1.4658
2025-26 Baie-Comeau Drakkar QMJHL 60 2 8 10 0.167 0.0819 0.0860 0.4451 0.4676
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#50848
Forward overall
#1066
Forward born in 2008
#1643
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

Adam Winborg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Michigan (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Kiefer Sherwood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Miami (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Riley Alferd
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
John Wiitala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Félix Caron
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ RPI (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Cornell Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Kyle Penney
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.44
actual FR PPG at Cornell
Luke Devlin
USHL 2021-22
0.29
actual FR PPG at Cornell
Sean Donaldson
BCHL 2018-19
0.45
actual FR PPG at Cornell
Tyler Catalano
USHL 2021-22
0.21
actual FR PPG at Cornell

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Altmann
Williams · 2014-15
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
J.P. Eykyn
Gustavus Adolphus · 2014-15
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Declan House
Franklin Pierce · 2018-19
0.467 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.