← New Search ↗ Social Card

Noah Jettelson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-03-13 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Holy Cross
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Taft NE-Prep 25 4 7 11 0.440 0.0872 0.0872 0.2005 0.2005
2024-25 Taft NE-Prep 24 5 13 18 0.750 0.1486 0.1486 0.3417 0.3417
2025-26 Cape Breton Eagles QMJHL 64 4 22 26 0.406 0.1996 0.1896 1.0847 1.0302
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7614
Defenseman overall
#1595
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Holy Cross Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2019-20
0.11
actual FR PPG at Holy Cross
NE-Prep 2023-24
0.17
actual FR PPG at Holy Cross
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.21
actual FR PPG at Holy Cross
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.10
actual FR PPG at Holy Cross

D2/3 Comparables

Lebanon Valley · 2018-19
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Anselm · 2001-02
1.375 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Gustavus Adolphus · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.