← New Search ↗ Social Card

Caine Bickel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-08-13 Country: USA
New Hampshire
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Philadelphia HC 13U AAA ayhl-13u 18 7 21 28 1.556 — — — —
2023-24 Holy Ghost Prep ushs-pa 15 3 2 5 0.333 — — — —
2024-25 Seacoast Performance Academy 15U 15u-aaa 55 25 31 56 1.018 — — — —
2025-26 Seacoast Performance Academy 16U 16u-aaa 61 80 70 150 2.459 — — — —
2026-27 Omaha Lancers USHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.1180 0.1180 0.6001 0.6001
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ American International (0.64 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Bentley (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

New Hampshire Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2018-19
0.47
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.12
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire
USHL 2015-16
0.14
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2002-03
1.240 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2015-16
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.