← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nolan Beddow Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-09-20 Country: USA
St. Lawrence
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Los Angeles Jr. Kings 13U AAA 13u-aaa 51 26 22 48 0.941 — — — —
2022-23 Shattuck St. Mary's 14U AAA naphl-14u 3 2 1 3 1.000 — — — —
2023-24 Shattuck St. Mary's 15U AAA 15u-aaa 57 18 16 34 0.597 — — — —
2024-25 Shattuck St. Mary's 16U AAA 16u-aaa 54 20 27 47 0.870 — — — —
2025-26 Shattuck St. Mary's 18U Prep ushs-prep 45 3 7 10 0.222 — — — —
2026-27 Oklahoma Warriors NAHL 7 1 2 3 0.429 0.1575 0.1703 0.4530 0.4897
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

St. Lawrence Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

BCHL 2022-23
0.36
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
BCHL 2021-22
0.22
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.31
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
OJHL 2016-17
0.24
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2009-10
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Gustavus Adolphus · 2014-15
0.423 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2015-16
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.