IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Samuel Boyer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-02-25 Country: Canada
Vermont
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Shawinigan Cataractes QMJHL 31 4 2 6 0.194 0.0951 0.0996 0.5167 0.5413
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
57%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#47978
Forward overall
#958
Forward born in 2008
#1504
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

Félix Caron
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ RPI (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jason Cotton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Eastman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Riley Alferd
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joe Widmar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ UMass (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Vermont Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Daniel Sambuco
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.08
actual FR PPG at Vermont
Blake Steenerson
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.41
actual FR PPG at Vermont
Massimo Lombardi
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.29
actual FR PPG at Vermont
Dawson Good
BCHL 2019-20
0.23
actual FR PPG at Vermont

D2/3 Comparables

Jared Coccimiglio
Neumann · 2021-22
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Chase Nieuwendyk
SUNY Brockport · 2008-09
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Zepeda
St. Norbert · 2008-09
0.821 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.