IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Samuel Boyer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-02-25 Country: Canada
Vermont
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Shawinigan Cataractes QMJHL 31 4 2 6 0.194 0.0951 0.0996 0.5166 0.5412
2026-27 Shawinigan Cataractes QMJHL 5 2 0 2 0.400 0.1965 0.1965 1.0678 1.0678
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#48494
Forward overall
#1069
Forward born in 2008
#1515
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

Mason Jobst
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Mackenzie MacEachern
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Boucher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy DeVito
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ RPI (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jeff Kubiak
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Vermont Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Blake Steenerson
USHS-MN 2022-23
0.41
actual FR PPG at Vermont
Luke Mountain
NAHL 2018-19
0.12
actual FR PPG at Vermont
Max Strand
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.67
actual FR PPG at Vermont
Jonah Aegerter
USHL 2022-23
0.47
actual FR PPG at Vermont

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Braccini
Bethel · 2019-20
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jonny Mulera
Salve Regina · 2017-18
1.409 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Armour
Adrian · 2012-13
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.