← New Search ↗ Social Card

Marc Johnstone Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-06-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.1981 0.2061 0.5250 0.5461
2015-16 Chicago Steel USHL 57 6 7 13 0.228 0.1402 0.1348 0.6720 0.6462
2016-17 Chicago Steel USHL 59 9 20 29 0.491 0.3021 0.2751 1.4481 1.3187
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Sacred Heart D1 AHA SR 16 6 10 16 1.000
2019-20 Sacred Heart D1 AHA JR 34 9 18 27 0.794
2018-19 Sacred Heart D1 AHA SO 37 5 17 22 0.595
2017-18 Sacred Heart D1 AHA FR 39 13 17 30 0.769
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.77
2017-18 · Sacred Heart
+310.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23039
Forward overall
#924
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2000-01
0.920 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2001-02
0.909 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Michael's College · 2003-04
1.280 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.