IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Drew Berres Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-12-22 Country: USA
Bowdoin
NESCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 46 0 4 4 0.087 0.0320 0.0360 0.0918 0.1034
2023-24 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 48 1 4 5 0.104 0.0383 0.0413 0.1100 0.1186
2024-25 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 59 0 12 12 0.203 0.0747 0.0766 0.2147 0.2202
2025-26 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 58 7 23 30 0.517 0.1900 0.1855 0.5459 0.5330
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12943
Defenseman overall
#2584
Defenseman born in 2005
#4344
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Van Voorhis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Bowdoin Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Mitch Dillon
0.48
actual FR PPG at Bowdoin
Graham Sisson
0.53
actual FR PPG at Bowdoin
Andy Nelson
0.71
actual FR PPG at Bowdoin
Nicholas Vassos
0.50
actual FR PPG at Bowdoin

D2/3 Comparables

Ricky Kramer
Fitchburg State · 2014-15
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Franco Loparco
Concordia · 2011-12
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Billy Dougherty
Salem State · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.