← New Search ↗ Social Card

Thomas Klochkov Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-03-30 Country: USA
Hamilton
NESCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Northeast Generals NAHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Northeast Generals NAHL 44 4 6 10 0.227 0.0835 0.0870 0.2399 0.2499
2024-25 Northeast Generals NAHL 20 2 11 13 0.650 0.2388 0.2362 0.6861 0.6786
2025-26 NAHL 47 8 23 31 0.660 0.2423 0.2277 0.6962 0.6543
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24797
Forward overall
#1408
Forward born in 2005
#1958
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Hamilton Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.73
actual FR PPG at Hamilton
0.44
actual FR PPG at Hamilton
0.89
actual FR PPG at Hamilton
0.88
actual FR PPG at Hamilton

D2/3 Comparables

Lake Forest · 2000-01
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2016-17
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alvernia · 2024-25
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.