← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sean Morgan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-09-02 Country: USA
University of New England
CNE D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2023-24 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 44 1 4 5 0.114 0.0417 0.0443 0.1201 0.1277
2024-25 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 55 3 7 10 0.182 0.0668 0.0675 0.1921 0.1941
2025-26 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 59 2 13 15 0.254 0.0934 0.0898 0.2687 0.2583
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20683
Defenseman overall
#3520
Defenseman born in 2005
#6028
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

University of New England Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

2.00
actual FR PPG at University of New England
0.75
actual FR PPG at University of New England
0.00
actual FR PPG at University of New England
1.00
actual FR PPG at University of New England

D2/3 Comparables

Hamilton · 2018-19
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Gustavus Adolphus · 2013-14
0.609 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2018-19
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.