← New Search ↗ Social Card

Wes Berg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-04-12 Country: USA
Bethel
MIAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Gentry Academy USHS-MN 19 10 11 21 1.105 0.1399 0.1399 0.2685 0.2685
2021-22 Gentry Academy USHS-MN 27 30 16 46 1.704 0.2157 0.2157 0.4138 0.4138
2022-23 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 7 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 51 6 10 16 0.314 0.1153 0.1203 0.3311 0.3454
2024-25 NAHL 37 8 14 22 0.595 0.2185 0.2165 0.6276 0.6218
2025-26 NAHL 55 10 16 26 0.473 0.1737 0.1636 0.4989 0.4698
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29757
Forward overall
#1751
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Bethel Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.00
actual FR PPG at Bethel
0.84
actual FR PPG at Bethel
0.40
actual FR PPG at Bethel
0.48
actual FR PPG at Bethel

D2/3 Comparables

Wentworth · 2021-22
0.381 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2021-22
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2023-24
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.