IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cameron Stehle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-05-15 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Stevenson
MAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 New Hampshire Mountain Kings NAHL 40 6 10 16 0.400 0.1470 0.1614 0.4222 0.4635
2024-25 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 49 22 32 54 1.102 0.4493 0.4709 0.8858 0.9284
2025-26 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 44 10 39 49 1.114 0.4540 0.4514 0.8951 0.8900
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
35%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4592
Forward overall
#80
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

Tyler Heinonen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Biggs
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Miami (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG
Robbie Payne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Phil Marinaccio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dominik Shine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.90 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG

Stevenson Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Matthew Dougherty
0.50
actual FR PPG at Stevenson
Mac Lowry
1.06
actual FR PPG at Stevenson
Austin Master
1.15
actual FR PPG at Stevenson
Christopher Lee
0.58
actual FR PPG at Stevenson

D2/3 Comparables

Riley Storzuk
Concordia · 2011-12
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Rey
Neumann · 2008-09
1.071 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Massimo Gentile
Colby · 2022-23
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.