IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Avan Pyle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-05-05 Country: USA
UMass Boston
LittleEast D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Proctor Academy NE-Prep 22 10 8 18 0.818 0.1621 0.1621 0.3728 0.3728
2022-23 Proctor Academy NE-Prep 26 11 18 29 1.115 0.2210 0.2210 0.5082 0.5082
2023-24 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 27 2 4 6 0.222 0.0816 0.0854 0.2345 0.2454
2024-25 — NAHL 28 0 5 5 0.179 0.0656 0.0652 0.1885 0.1874
2025-26 — NCDC 33 20 10 30 0.909 0.3706 0.3495 0.5278 0.4987
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
42%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16495
Forward overall
#860
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

UMass Boston Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Drew Gannon
0.41
actual FR PPG at UMass Boston
Tim Murphy
1.00
actual FR PPG at UMass Boston
Jack Mortson
0.47
actual FR PPG at UMass Boston
Corey Chakeen
0.54
actual FR PPG at UMass Boston

D2/3 Comparables

Hudson Cameron
Fredonia · 2024-25
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Rory Andriole
Tufts · 2023-24
0.368 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendon Gysbers
St. Norbert · 2017-18
0.871 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.