← New Search ↗ Social Card

James Bond Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-01-05 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Maine
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Maine Nordiques NAHL 17 0 2 2 0.118 0.0432 0.0488 0.1243 0.1405
2024-25 Maine Nordiques NAHL 14 0 2 2 0.143 0.0525 0.0566 0.1510 0.1627
2025-26 Powell River Kings BCHL 47 1 4 5 0.106 0.0410 0.0420 0.1547 0.1583
2026-27 Watertown Shamrocks NAHL 7 0 3 3 0.429 0.1575 0.1568 0.4530 0.4510
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28959
Defenseman overall
#3263
Defenseman born in 2007
#6994
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Maine Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

CCHL 2018-19
0.21
actual FR PPG at Maine
BCHL 2022-23
0.00
actual FR PPG at Maine
CCHL 2014-15
0.24
actual FR PPG at Maine
BCHL 2013-14
0.18
actual FR PPG at Maine

D2/3 Comparables

Chatham · 2016-17
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2016-17
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2022-23
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.