← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cole Roenick Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-04-12 Country: USA
Suffolk
CNE D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Berwick NE-Prep 27 0 3 3 0.111 0.0223 0.0223 0.0508 0.0508
2021-22 Winchendon NE-Prep 25 4 8 12 0.480 0.0965 0.0965 0.2195 0.2195
2022-23 Winchendon NE-Prep 31 8 11 19 0.613 0.1233 0.1233 0.2803 0.2803
2023-24 New Hampshire Mountain Kings NAHL 6 0 1 1 0.167 0.0612 0.0639 0.1762 0.1838
2024-25 New Hampshire Mountain Kings NAHL 57 8 8 16 0.281 0.1031 0.1022 0.2967 0.2940
2025-26 New Hampshire Mountain Kings NAHL 53 9 8 17 0.321 0.1179 0.1110 0.3391 0.3193
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#36741
Forward overall
#2245
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Suffolk Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.40
actual FR PPG at Suffolk
0.42
actual FR PPG at Suffolk
0.36
actual FR PPG at Suffolk
0.26
actual FR PPG at Suffolk

D2/3 Comparables

Saint John's · 2008-09
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2010-11
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nazareth · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.