IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hayden Vonk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-03-01 Country: USA
Connecticut College
NESCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 — NAHL 14 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2024-25 Wisconsin Windigo NAHL 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2025-26 P.A.L. Junior Islanders NCDC 43 2 17 19 0.442 0.1802 0.1683 0.3552 0.3318
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
35%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8732
Defenseman overall
#1956
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Connecticut College Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Jeff Thompson
0.64
actual FR PPG at Connecticut College
Jacob Moreau
0.52
actual FR PPG at Connecticut College
Joseph Giordano
0.33
actual FR PPG at Connecticut College
Jack Houser
0.27
actual FR PPG at Connecticut College

D2/3 Comparables

Brett Williams
Westfield State · 2021-22
0.296 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Levi Carter
Concordia · 2023-24
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Daluisio
UMass Boston · 2018-19
0.231 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.