← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hayden Vonk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-03-01 Country: USA
Connecticut College
NESCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 — NAHL 14 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2024-25 Wisconsin Windigo NAHL 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2025-26 P.A.L. Junior Islanders NCDC 43 2 17 19 0.442 0.1802 0.1683 0.3536 0.3303
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
38%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9025
Defenseman overall
#1991
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Connecticut College Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.64
actual FR PPG at Connecticut College
0.52
actual FR PPG at Connecticut College
0.33
actual FR PPG at Connecticut College
0.27
actual FR PPG at Connecticut College

D2/3 Comparables

Westfield State · 2021-22
0.296 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2021-22
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2023-24
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.