IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Owen Leahy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-02-11 Country: USA
Hamilton
NESCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Lawrence Academy NE-Prep 26 3 8 11 0.423 0.0838 0.0838 0.1928 0.1928
2023-24 Lawrence Academy NE-Prep 27 6 13 19 0.704 0.1394 0.1394 0.3206 0.3206
2024-25 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 59 22 23 45 0.763 0.2802 0.2753 0.8050 0.7910
2025-26 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 59 14 30 44 0.746 0.2740 0.2558 0.7872 0.7348
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18011
Forward overall
#960
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

Hamilton Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Anthony Ruberto
0.44
actual FR PPG at Hamilton
Kenny Matheson
0.89
actual FR PPG at Hamilton
Nick Anderson
0.88
actual FR PPG at Hamilton
Kyle Roulston
0.73
actual FR PPG at Hamilton

D2/3 Comparables

Ethan James
Wisconsin-Superior · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Couto
SUNY Potsdam · 2009-10
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Will Soloway
Colby · 2023-24
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.