IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Beckett Hinchsliff Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-03-13 Country: USA
Tufts
NESCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 45 5 10 15 0.333 0.0817 0.0823 0.2295 0.2313
2024-25 El Paso Rhinos NAHL 55 18 12 30 0.545 0.2004 0.1977 0.5758 0.5682
2025-26 — NAHL 52 10 20 30 0.577 0.2120 0.1988 0.6089 0.5709
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28680
Forward overall
#1680
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Tufts Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Rory Andriole
0.37
actual FR PPG at Tufts
Lindsay Walker
0.67
actual FR PPG at Tufts
Dennis Davidson
0.52
actual FR PPG at Tufts
Tyler Voigt
0.96
actual FR PPG at Tufts

D2/3 Comparables

Devon Rice
SUNY Geneseo · 2011-12
0.471 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Vidoni
Westfield State · 2010-11
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Mulrenin
Hamline · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.