IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alexander Duhon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-12-14 Country: Slovakia
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Stevenson
MAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 New Hampshire Mountain Kings NAHL 50 9 18 27 0.540 0.1984 0.2132 0.5700 0.6125
2025-26 — NAHL 50 12 19 31 0.620 0.2278 0.2336 0.6544 0.6709
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23172
Forward overall
#1078
Forward born in 2006
#1741
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Kenny Gillespie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ RPI (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Austin Vieth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Blake Winiecki
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Canon Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Stevenson Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Mac Lowry
1.06
actual FR PPG at Stevenson
Rhett Evjen
0.50
actual FR PPG at Stevenson
Christopher Lee
0.58
actual FR PPG at Stevenson
Frank Vitucci
0.73
actual FR PPG at Stevenson

D2/3 Comparables

Brent Jones
Trine · 2016-17
0.524 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hunter Wendt
Adrian · 2016-17
1.034 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Cassidy Bowes
Endicott · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.