IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jaden Sikura Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-02-15 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Army
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Northeast Generals NAHL 40 6 21 27 0.675 0.2480 0.2562 0.7125 0.7361
2025-26 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 46 23 17 40 0.870 0.3195 0.3144 0.9179 0.9032
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14529
Forward overall
#573
Forward born in 2006
#649
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
Cameron Brown
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
Eric Freschi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Foster
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Charlie O'Connor
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Army Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Jacob Ivey
NAHL 2023-24
0.66
actual FR PPG at Army
Benjamin Ivey
NAHL 2023-24
0.57
actual FR PPG at Army
Trevor Fidler
USPHL-Premier-Classic 2014-15
0.47
actual FR PPG at Army
Reese Farrell
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.25
actual FR PPG at Army

D2/3 Comparables

Oliver De Croock
Lawrence · 2018-19
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cam Bergeman
University of New England · 2022-23
0.783 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Treacy
SUNY Potsdam · 2004-05
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.