IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brenden Bedorf Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-06-08 Country: USA
Amherst
NESCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 35 2 12 14 0.400 0.1342 0.1382 0.3702 0.3812
2024-25 Elmira Aviators NAHL 56 1 16 17 0.304 0.1115 0.1113 0.3204 0.3200
2025-26 Elmira Aviators NAHL 59 3 20 23 0.390 0.1432 0.1360 0.4114 0.3906
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11826
Defenseman overall
#2416
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Amherst Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Zachary Murray
0.50
actual FR PPG at Amherst
Jamie Hawkrigg
0.64
actual FR PPG at Amherst
Topher Flanagan
0.39
actual FR PPG at Amherst
P.J. Conlon
0.38
actual FR PPG at Amherst

D2/3 Comparables

Brendon Zack
Buffalo State · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Miles Berg
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Shane Cavalieri
SUNY Brockport · 2011-12
0.609 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.